On 26 August 2012 11:02, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/8/24 Gregory <nomoregra...@googlemail.com>: > > > > If you walk past a building that says "Toy Factory" but everyone knows > it is > > a secret military base because of the armed guards. You map it as a toy > > factory. > > > -1, you might map the sign as "toy factory" (maybe I am > misinterpreting what you said? I never met a building that "said" > something ;-) ) but if _on the ground_ it is a military installation > and you ("everyone") know about this, mapping it as a toy factory > would be plain wrong and also a violation of the on the ground rule. > > I mean if the military are keeping the site a secret and the building has a sign on it "Welcome To Mr Smith's Toy Factory", then that is what it should be mapped as because on the ground it says it is a toy factory. Local knowledge may say they never see toys coming out of it, only military personnel, but that is it. I know there are real examples, but I can only slightly remember the details of one. A solider was posted to guard a radio mast on top of a hill. He would come down to the town to have dinner in a restaurant or what ever. People would ask him why he was posted there. He'd totally deny that there was a radio mast on the hill. Well the mast is pretty obvious from hills around, so everyone knew why he was there. I can't remember if he still denied it once the country was no longer under communism and war-focused. -- Gregory o...@livingwithdragons.com http://www.livingwithdragons.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk