Hi Martin,

You forgot to put the French list in cc


> There is generally a problem with entering data for which you are not
> the full rights holder and which is not in the PD. The data you
> import/merge has strings attached (requires attribution which may not
> be removed) which might lead to removal of the data in the case the
> active contributors choose to switch to a more open license (e.g.
> cc0), so it is very important that this data is easily identificable.

I was thinking that this issues was addressed by the CT providing all rights to 
the OSMF for data added to OSM.
Am I wrong ?


> Maybe
> on the server side we could allow several OSM accounts for the same
> email adress (not sure if this is already the case, but from former
> discussions I remember that this was one of the concerns)?

I test it few minutes ago and I confirm this is not possible.
IMHO this is an issue.

best regards
Julien





>________________________________
> De : Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
>À : winfi...@gmail.com 
>Cc : osm <talk@openstreetmap.org>; d...@osmfoundation.org 
>Envoyé le : Jeudi 18 octobre 2012 13h10
>Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] Continued aggression against French 
>contributors (cadastre integration)
> 
>2012/10/18 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>:
>> The French are integrating the data of the cadastre, their surveys, their
>> local knowledge and Bing aerial images to improve Openstreetmap.org as a
>> whole. They are not doing a bulk import that needs to be sorted out later
>> on.
>> The local community's opinion should be more important in this matter, than
>> the opinion of one person in the UK and the DWG should wield its power to
>> block actual acts of vandalism, instead of annoying good contributors.
>
>
>please also see the other side's motivation: there is good reason not
>to put meta data into the main database but on a changeset level,
>still your local guidelines apparently lead to filling the global
>database up with source-tags:
>http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source#values
>(There are roughly spoken more than 7 times cadastre source-tags than
>there are for example source=bing tags)
>
>There is generally a problem with entering data for which you are not
>the full rights holder and which is not in the PD. The data you
>import/merge has strings attached (requires attribution which may not
>be removed) which might lead to removal of the data in the case the
>active contributors choose to switch to a more open license (e.g.
>cc0), so it is very important that this data is easily identificable.
>
>The guidelines for imports are clear (use distinct account, make an
>information page in the wiki). IMHO this is not a very complicated
>requirement, but I agree it could - on a technical level - be made
>easier to manage multiple accounts. Maybe someone of the French
>community (or someone else) has the time and expertise to code an
>extension for JOSM which would allow to change between multiple
>accounts on the fly or assign the edits of the same session in the
>editor to different accounts while editing and on upload this would
>automatically create several changesets (one for each account)? Maybe
>on the server side we could allow several OSM accounts for the same
>email adress (not sure if this is already the case, but from former
>discussions I remember that this was one of the concerns)?
>
>Cheers,
>Martin
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to