I did my own analysis for housenumbers in Belgium, but that only took the last person who touched the object into account. The numbers look in the right ballpark for the people I verified. The real algorithm should be: the last person who added the housenumber the object has in the latest version.
Thanks for this and best wishes, Jo 2012/12/30 Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> > Hi, > > I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has > added. It uses object history, so it should be able to correctly "award" > the count to the person actually adding the addr:housenumber tag. > > I don't yet know what will happen with this, but before I make further > plans, here's the current list of all accounts that have added addresses, > and how many: > > http://www.remote.org/**frederik/tmp/housenumbers.html<http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/housenumbers.html> > > It would be great if you could find your name on the list and do a quick > sanity check in your head whether this looks right or not. > > According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k house > numbers - if any one of them has actually surveyed that many houses they > should be awarded a prize! A further ~ 1400 have done between 1k and 10k > numbers, and ~ 4600 have done between 100 and 1k numbers. > > It is quite possible that the program has bugs so if you notice something > strange, do mention it. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > ______________________________**_________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
