How about "et al."? On Thu, 02 May 2013 06:58:35 Alex Barth wrote: > Paul - sorry, yeah. Not talking to ODC but I'll make sure to run by LWG. > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > > > From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 12:57 PM > > > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark > > > > > > Thanks for weighing in everyone. Based on the discussion, here are the > > > immediate adjustments I'm seeing shaking out from this thread: > > > > > > 1. Don't mandate, but recommend/offer attribution mark > > > 2. Make it clear that /copyright is scrollable > > > 3. Let's do an alt text to make sure we're on Google's radar ;) > > > 4. Make sure mark is easy to embed > > > > A 5th point was that it wasn't clear that the mark complies with ODbL > > 4.3. > > > > Have you sought the opinion of the ODC as to what they intended by that > > section?
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
