If we went ahead with this we would be saying that “Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available here under the Open Database License (ODbL)” is acceptable, an image that says “By OSM” is acceptable, but “© OpenStreetMap” is only acceptable if “By OSM” cannot be used. To me this seems to be insupportable by the license.
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:08 PM To: Paul Norman Cc: Talk Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark) Paul - On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: I can’t see any legal justification in the ODbL for allowing a mark or the example notice, but not something between. Not sure I follow.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
