John Firebaugh wrote > Hi Andy, > > Thanks, this is great. I love having real numbers to discuss.
Indeed, that is great. So thanks for the effort to produce these numbers and allow the discussion to come back to an objective debate. Those numbers speaks towards that iD is "no worse" than P2, probably better, which is the most important criterion for making iD the default editor. It might still be nice to think about a possibility for a staged introduction (random sub-sample of newly created accounts are set to iD as the default, the rest initially remains at P2) to collect more statistics and eliminate the bias Andy mentioned in the "more serious errors". One possible further thing to look at is, if there is a bias in "editor retention" in either iD or P2 depending on the browser used, given that iDs performance depends on the browser used. Is this information available anywhere though? Kai -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Making-iD-the-default-editor-on-osm-org-tp5773770p5774425.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
