Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> BTW osrm.at is helping in this campaign, because it doesn't route through >> tracks > > BTW I just discover that some people are tagging for routing (after > "tagging for the renderer"). They add "access=yes" or > "motor_vehicle=yes" to open the routable track in OSRM...
If the public really has a legal right of access, similar to a road, then access=yes sounds entirely fair. Around me, almost all tracks are either on private land (e.g, for agricultural use), where there is no right of access, or are in conservation land, wildlife management areas, etc., and are there for emergency access, maintenance, etc. and typically blocked from motor vehicle use by locked gates. But, typically pedestrian/bicyclists/horses are allowed. If orsm is defaulting to access=private for vehicle routing for tracks with no access tag, that does not sound unreasonable.
pgpVnwmFqKSP5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
