Am 25.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Dave F.: > On 23/10/2013 10:01, Pieren wrote: >> But I can say that tagging each lane with >> "highway=motorway" + "lanes=1" is incorrect and seems to be "tagging >> for the renderer" (just to show the toll on mapnik) > > There's nothing wrong with that. It's mapped accurately as individual > lanes & clarified with the lanes=* tag.
As long as there is no physical separation you should use the :lanes system and only use separate ways for the individual booths. > All elements are "tagged for the renderer" How else would they know how > to render them? What shouldn't be done is tagging incorrectly to get it > to render, such as labelling a golf bunker as a beach to get it to > appear yellow. I'm surprised someone with your OSM experience needs to > be reminded of this. Well, as long as the renderer do not respect width=* or lanes=* people will experiment and rendering is not the only purpose. You can do quite a lot more things with a geodata base. I do not want to tag for the renderer (e.g. I do not add area=yes on any multipolygon and closed ways which make no sense to not be interpreted as area). I even did open a bug report about it against carto only to have it closed as "other software". cu fly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
