Re: [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

> Am 03.06.2015 um 11:36 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> 
> landcover rather than landuse? (for woodland, grass, forest etc)


there is a landcover tag proposal, grass is a proposed value, but forest and 
grassland are deliberately not, please use "trees" (regardless of any 
forest/wood/other groups of trees-distinction). "woodland" could be a 
key:natural object (name etc), for landcover it would be split into trees and 
grass, bushes etc. (if you went to that level of detail).

shouldn't this be discussed on tagging?


cheers 
Martin 
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk