On 12 September 2015 03:26:40 GMT+01:00, Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote:
>If you *don't* do this, then your true opinion will be revealed that
>you are in fact okay with people adding railway=abandoned to
>highway=track, and you're just wasting everybody's time on the mailing
>list by arguing for actions you are unwilling to take.

Oh please Russ, I'm trying to stop participating in this thread, but the way 
you are debating (regardless of your opinions in the debate) is just 
disrespectful. Your rethorical example ignores the fact that not mass-deleting 
all those objects is (amongst other things) a mark of respect for a debate that 
is not resolved (and by the look of things never will be). It does not in any 
way imply that that person is ok with the objects being in the db. The mirrored 
hypothetical example of somebody doing a mass-undelete would be equaly 
ridiculous.

You are again and again asking contributors to respect your opinions, without 
respecting theirs. You insult people calling them vandals and a caricatural 
view of deletionists. You use all-caps. You threathen of bans. You seem to 
think that debates like this could only be fully won or fully lost, with no 
level in-between, and have accordingly not made any concessions to your views. 
You are not debating. This is not a healthy way to interact with the community.

Bans in osm are issued either for vandalism or for repeated and serious 
community interaction failures. Never simply for making an honest but 
controversial contribution. Feel free to correct me if you are a DWG member. I 
don't think that you shoud get a ban, but sometimes I catch myself wishing that 
you would.

Russ, please follow the advice that has been given to many people in this 
thread already, and give it a rest.
-- 
Vincent Dp

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to