You want to ban meetups and irl friendships too? /Andreas
Skickat från min iPhone > 2 apr. 2016 kl. 12:52 skrev Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>: > > There's an irony in these latest communication channels (loomio?) being > called 'collaborative'. The more that are used within OSM the more fractured > the communication becomes. > > It wouldn't be so bad if any conclusions were broadcast, but increasingly > they're not. > > IRC, due to its exclusiveness does nothing to promote a "community" which > many wish to attain. > > Dave F. > >> On 02/04/2016 00:21, Dave F wrote: >> >>> On 30/03/2016 22:20, Ian Sergeant wrote: >>> >>> I've never seen it as a hotbed of uncountered policymaking. >> >> This is another case which confirms my point: As there's no record, unless >> you're on it 24/7, you'll have no idea what it's being used for, or when. >> >> On a couple of occasions I've been told it was used to make decision about >> OSM. They wanted to talk to 'like minded people', away from all the 'noise'. >> (paraphrased) >> >> On a slight tangent, it's disappointing that the developers of the iD editor >> are reluctant to discuss its tagging features on the tagging forum. >> >> Dave F. >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
