I don't know why it should be an invention by Zverik. However, since he is
both an OSFM board member and working for MAPS.ME he might show up with a
solution.

Cheers, Johan

2016-06-19 20:45 GMT+02:00 Tomas Straupis <tomasstrau...@gmail.com>:

>   There is one bad convergence on this.
>
>   While I can also observe that in Lithuania in last month there was a
> huge increase in mapsme "edits" and 50% of those are straight bullshit
> (like adding as an artwork objects like "my crib", "place I fish",
> adding cyrillic names to name tag in Lithuania where cyrilic is
> totally alien etc.), 30% edits like adding duplicate points and only
> ~20% being edits which could be interpreted and after editing begin
> useful. Thankfully in Lithuania we employ a mechanism similar to
> wikipedias "patrolling" so things like that are fixed pretty quickly.
> But still it uses resources which could be used better.
>
>   But this is one another Zveriks "inventions" introducing havoc in
> OSM. We had russian automated translation adding to name:ru tags
> worldwide "because world of tank needs that". Before that we had
> zveriks "idea" of introducing natural=water for everything that is
> blue to tagging. Which was made less than a year after he joined OSM
> and with hundreds of thousands of objects already marked in a
> different way (that idea has failed because even after five years
> people still mark objects usual way rather than the new scheme).
>
>   Worst of all Zverik did not engage in any discussion about
> aforementioned bad decisions!
>
>   Maybe we should have some guards against such non discussed high
> impact "inventions"? And in case of "natural=water for everything
> blue" some mechanism to revert such not well thought out "proposals"?
>
> --
> Tomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to