On 04/01/2017 22:24, Mikel Maron wrote:
Ok I hear you. Let me walk this back a step. Not the same standard,
but a standard beyond now that gives some visibility to the process. I
know there is a process of monitoring, analysis, communication and
action followed by the DWG. Let's document that. And a simple not
burdensome log of actions - summarizing the above. This visibility
will improve community understanding of the process, help to spot
trends, and improve everyone's work overall.
Well if it helps, my answer yesterday to this help question
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53812/contested-border-sahrawi-morocco-decision-to-display
explains the process that was followed to try and come up with some kind
of consensus as to how to display that area in OSM. However, what
worked in that case may not be appropriate elsewhere because each case
is different - in fact the most common response that I give to the DWG
stuff that I deal with is just to try and get everyone to talk to each
other more to try and understand other points of view, no other actions
needed.
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
