Hi Tomas Two comments on this:
1. My ceterum-censeo is, that we really need a polygon type in OSM. This would make mapping, and many written and unwritten(!) rules much easier (not to forget software). 2. I'd like to support Martin and want to point to network topology which is important for navigation. I currently have a use case where we want to enhance pedestrian routing and did not find (yet) any rules how to connect a footway e.g. to a street (what I'm sure is that currently the 'big' route planners only consider footways as part of the routable network if ways share same node). :Stefan 2017-10-25 14:19 GMT+02:00 Tomas Straupis <tomasstrau...@gmail.com>: > 2017-10-25 14:03 GMT+03:00 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> For a long time I wanted to hear opinion on the topic of topology rules. >> most important is IMHO: when do you share nodes, and when not. >> <...> > > Thank you for notes about the rules, I will think about it at least > for local rules. > > For the time being I'm more interested in general opinion on: > „do/don't, why, how, when“ stuff. > > It could really be too early for such stuff and I could probably > continue it locally for some more time. > > -- > Tomas > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
