2018-11-20, an, 14:33 john whelan rašė: > I think you have expressed your opinion but unfortunately whilst difficult > for you to accept traditionally OSM maps a certain way and has done > for sometime even though many governments and others would wish > we did something else.
Can you give an example where things in OpenStreetMap are mapped in a different way than overwhelming majority of world thinks? Note: I'm not asking to tag Crimea as just Ukraine (which would be my personal opinion). I'm asking to have an open discussion of disputed territory rules and hopefully revert to the previous "middle ground" which was acceptable to more/most parties - thus being less partitioning. There was no such discussion yet. In November there was something like that starting, but then Frederik wrote this: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-October/081570.html Well, English is not my native tongue, but I do not see any possibility to discuss in these claims: "the Crimea issue is currently being discussed in DWG." "This policy is not likely to change any time soon." I read it as: we are discussing it internally but are not going to change anything. No surprise discussion has stopped shortly after that. I personally was expecting DWG to come up with some generalisation and a number of proposals which could be discussed. But that did not happen. Decision has been taken and not announced. P.S. I encourage people responding to me personally to reply to the mailing list, so that It would be visible this is not just my personal opinion. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
