Paul Norman via talk <talk@openstreetmap.org> writes: > On 2019-02-28 2:35 p.m., Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> >> In recent years some OSM data consumers and "OSM as a service" >> providers have begun to put the credit to OpenStreetMap behind an >> click-through 'About', 'Credits', 'Legal' or '(i)' link. Examples: >> >> https://docs.mapbox.com/help/img/android/android-first-steps-intro.png >> https://www.systemed.net/osm/IMG_1846.PNG > > In my mind what makes these examples particularly egregious is how > they find room for image logos. If there's room for a Mapbox or Tomtom > logo like in the images above, there's room for (c) OpenStreetMap > > With maps like this, I would expect a "reasonably calculated" > attribution to have OSM with at least the prominence of other > companies.
Agreed. The notion that there isn't room does not hold up to scrutiny. I tend towards OSM being more aggressive about insisting that the attribution rules be followed. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
