Hi Simon, This guideline is a great piece of work, thanks a lot to all the participants. Inevitably, this will be too much or not enough for anybody, however I find the content reasonable and in line with what I understood from current written expectations. A few more mockups, notably for minimaps and apps would be great. After all the text is clear enough and I would find the "yes, but we want to let the designer some freedom" argument a bit hypocritical. Yves
Le 9 août 2019 09:41:25 GMT+02:00, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> a écrit : >As we've mentioned multiple times over the last months, the LWG decided >last year to consolidate all attribution guidance in to one document >and >address some of the use cases that have become common over the last 7 >years that previously had none. Particularly in the light of the >parallel discussions about attribution on larger social media platforms >we need to make up our minds what we actually want, and define concrete >minimum requirements for acceptable attribution. To not do this just >provides the excuse of pointing to the cacophony of voices all saying >something different. > >We've been working on and off on the document for a while, and are now >largely finished. Going forward we intend to wikify the document and >make it available for public comment together with a BoF session at >SotM >next month (which probably means that we'll have to appropriate a >coffee >break). You can have a glimpse at the text here >https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e_IQYHtqVivGRw4O4EOn6__-LGMuzPlWz6XKEdAkwW0/edit?usp=sharing >the few things that are not nailed down belong to those that we would >appreciate feedback on. > >Simon > >PS: the number of coffee breaks permitting we might want to appropriate >another one for the discussion of a tile licence change.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
