even if we would have a right to be quoted for the absent data, IMHO it would be silly to pursue the case. I‘d rather spend the resources on those cases where they are actually using OpenStreetMap data and not sufficiently attributing it. There’s a lot of cases, Facebook being one of them.
I also find it strange that the geocoding guideline sees geocoding results as produced works, but then waives the attribution requirement for their use (only the geocoder must attribute, the results seem to be free of any attribution requirements) https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Geocoding_-_Guideline Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
