I am sure others may have seen this 'blacklist' implementation for showing a reminder about attribution.
https://twitter.com/cq94/status/1234528717604577282 Worthy of consideration for openstreetmap.org? Cheers - Phil -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2020 11:23 AM To: Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> Cc: openstreetmap <talk@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update Is there any update about the attribution guidelines? At this point is there a chance that further comments and concerns will be addressed, or is this a "done deal", where community input is no longer going to be considered? - Joseph Eisenberg On 2/19/20, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > The LWG has now integrated feedback from the initial airing in August > last year, from a total of three sessions at SOTM-US and SOTM in > Heidelberg, feedback from the OSMF board and from the wider OSM community. > > Barring any major late developing issues, we intend to forward this to > the OSMF board for formal approval at the next LWG meeting on the 12th > of March. If you have any comments please feel free to add them to the > wikis talk page. > > The updated document can be found here > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft_Attribution_Guideline > > Simon > > PS: please disregard the numbering in the document, that will not be > present on the OSMF wiki. > > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
