This looks at first as a nuisance that could be perceived as a bad move, but the feedback you're receiving rather prove the contrary. Well done! Ps: would you share your nginx partial redirect, I may consider it for Opensnowmap tiles policy?
Le 8 mars 2020 10:14:58 GMT+01:00, Christian Quest <cqu...@openstreetmap.fr> a écrit : >Here is a hort report on this experiment... > >I started a week ago by searching OSM France tile server logs for >referer and checked manually if the map on the refering page was >correctly attributed. > >This allowed me to create a short list of 20 entries of sites using the > >french styled tiles and the humanitarian tiles (yes, it is made by OSM >France). > > >I then modified our nginx based proxy_cache configuration, to redirect >some tiles to an "attribution tile" only for the domain in the list. > >For two of them, I tweeted about it... the most visible one is the >moroco yellow page service, generating a little less than a million >daily tile requests on our servers. > >https://twitter.com/cq94/status/1234516075695525888 > >In less than 24 hours, the attribution appeared and I removed them from > >the list. > >https://twitter.com/cq94/status/1234779931537739776 > > >Then I included an email address in the attribution reminder tile... >and >got emails back within a few hours. > >Some were asking how to do the attribution, others telling me the >attribution was now ok and asking how to remove the reminder tiles. > >In my answers, I also remind that our tile service made by volunteers >on >donated hardware is not unlimited and inviting them to have a look at >switch2osm to setup their own tile server or use a commercial provider. > >Up to now, nobody complained :) > > >Yesterday, I've started automating attribution checking using selenium. > >For each referer, a python script loads the page, searches for tiles, >then looks for attribution text or link. The result is stored in a >postgresql database which allows to group referers by url, hostname and >ip. > >The attribution percentage I currently see is around 70-80% which is >not >that bad. > >My next major step is to use the same technique to remind about tile >usage policy... > > >To do something similar on osm.org, a first step is to extract referers > >from the cache logs, then use the automated attribution check to >evaluate the situation. > > >Le 08/03/2020 à 01:52, Nuno Caldeira a écrit : >> That would be a good option for those that use third party providers >> of OSM. But to be honest, from my experience I highly doubt that even > >> corporate members of OSMF, like Mapbox would do it, when their client > >> Facebook (also corporate member of OSMF) after one year and half, >> still has maps with lack of attribution or attributed to HERE, when >> it's clearly OSM. >> >> On Sun, 8 Mar 2020, 00:46 Phil Wyatt, <p...@wyatt-family.com >> <mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com>> wrote: >> >> I am sure others may have seen this 'blacklist' implementation >for >> showing a reminder about attribution. >> >> https://twitter.com/cq94/status/1234528717604577282 >> >> Worthy of consideration for openstreetmap.org >> <http://openstreetmap.org>? >> >> Cheers - Phil >> >-- >Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
