On Friday 17 April 2020, Simon Poole wrote: > > With the exception of imported datasources that are not > re-licensable, you do realise though that the actual licensor of the > data -is- the OSMF? And that attributing "OpenstreetMap contributors" > is at best a sentimental relict (nothing against being sentimental, > but that isn't your argument) and is, if anything, more confusing and > misleading than simply asking for an attribution string that credits > the project?
I am not meaning to question the (legal) reasoning behind the suggestion to credit 'OpenStreetMap'. My consideration is purely a moral one. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
