Hi Mateusz, Am 18/07/2020 um 19.29 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > Can you link affected data in Poland? > > In Poland you actually can reliably estimate real tracktype based solely > on high quality aerial images (not satellite imagery that is unlikely to be > sufficient), typically Geoportal 2 aerial and LIDAR data available in ISOK > Cień dataset. > > Note that your planned automatic revert likely counts as automatic > edits and needs to fullfill > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct > requirements, including support from other editors.
I do not think that my revert is an automated edit as intended by the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. I am reaching out to the community in advance because different people might have a different opinion on how reliable tracktype=* needs to be and how reliable surveying from satellite imagery is. I think that the description "all objects modified by Modest7 since 1 January 2020" is sufficient. You can use OSMcha, can't you? Or would you like to have a large .osc files of his changes? Currently, the revert is disputed. That's not a condition I would like to have for a mass edit. If people in favour of a revert will not voice their opinion in this discussion, it is very likely that I will not do the revert on international level. The Polish community is free to object as it is their data (quality), not mine. I asked the German community today because I suspect that Germans are quite sensible when it comes to one of our key assets of OSM in Germany: surveyed highway=track. If people on the German forum agree with a revert, the revert will be limited to Germany. If other local communities ask me to perform the revert in their country, I will do it there. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70056 Best regards Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
