Jul 18, 2020, 21:09 by osm...@michreichert.de: > Hi Mateusz, > > Am 18/07/2020 um 19.29 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > >> Can you link affected data in Poland? >> >> In Poland you actually can reliably estimate real tracktype based solely >> on high quality aerial images (not satellite imagery that is unlikely to be >> sufficient), typically Geoportal 2 aerial and LIDAR data available in ISOK >> Cień dataset. >> >> Note that your planned automatic revert likely counts as automatic >> edits and needs to fullfill >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct >> requirements, including support from other editors. >> > > I do not think that my revert is an automated edit as intended by the > Automated Edits Code of Conduct.I am reaching out to the community in > advance because different people might have a different opinion on how > reliable tracktype=* needs to be and how reliable surveying from > satellite imagery is. > Are you sure that just satellite imagery was used? I suspect that also aerial imagery was used in edits. > > I think that the description "all objects modified by Modest7 since 1 > January 2020" is sufficient. > I thought that revert was supposed to cover tracktype edits only? > You can use OSMcha, can't you? > I am unfamiliar with OSMcha. > Or would you > like to have a large .osc files of his changes? > I would prefer list of OSM objects that would be affected within boundaries of Poland.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
