> So I wouldn't suggest worrying too much about the lists. Theory and practice > of community interaction elsewhere in OSM is absolutely a valid and > interesting topic, but the lists belong to pretty much the same period in OSM > history as IRC and Potlatch, and I say that as someone who still uses both. :)
Mhh, the tagging proposal workflow still involves tagging@ as a requirement. And many of the tagging@ members flamed against a proposed move over to Discourse . This change would had allowed me to participate in tagging discussions again :) May 3, 2023 11:23:06 Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net>: > Courtney wrote: >> Or is it going to keep doing the same old flame wars? > > To be honest, the mailing lists have been on the way out for a long time now, > and talk@ is no exception. Some once busy lists are now basically dead (dev@, > legal-talk@, talk-de@). Others are noticeably quieter (talk@, talk-fr@, > osmf-talk@). A few local communities still prefer mailing lists but they're > fewer in number every year. Generally, the vital new stuff in OSM doesn't > happen on mailing lists. > > So I wouldn't suggest worrying too much about the lists. Theory and practice > of community interaction elsewhere in OSM is absolutely a valid and > interesting topic, but the lists belong to pretty much the same period in OSM > history as IRC and Potlatch, and I say that as someone who still uses both. :) > > Richard
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
