Now that we seem to have established that this was not a CWG thing to
start with, could everyone who was involved in creating this
announcement please review their communication behaviour, *especially*
when it comes to signing messages as "so-and-so, OSMF communications
working group" when you're not writing in an official capacity. This is
something that other working groups as well as the OSMF board have been
practicing carefully for ages and I'd hope that it would not be beyond
members of a communications working group to be precise in their
communication.
On 4/28/23 15:29, Marjan Van de Kauter wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are doing a research project on how OpenStreetMap users interact with
each other. Are you willing to help us learn more about communication
behaviors in OSM? Take this quick and anonymous survey and tell us if
and how you use the OSM community forum, mailing lists, social media and
other channels:
https://forms.gle/UeAGs3VahuxBN7Ec7 <https://forms.gle/UeAGs3VahuxBN7Ec7>
We will share the results of this survey, along with other data, with
the community. This can help users better understand communication
habits in OSM, so they can identify the most effective ways to reach
other community members. We will be presenting our findings at State of
the Map US in Richmond, Virginia and in diary entries. So stay tuned for
more and thank you for participating in our survey.
Have a great weekend!
Marjan Van de Kauter (OSMF Communication Working Group member and TomTom
community engager)
Courtney Williamson (OSMF Communication Working Group member)
Keara Dennehy (TomTom business analyst)
L.J. Lambert (TomTom business analyst)
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk