On 18/5/23 04:48, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:



May 16, 2023, 19:22 by ajt1...@gmail.com:

    On 24/04/2023 16:57, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:


    Apr 22, 2023, 14:10 by ajt1...@gmail.com:

        More generally, anyone with half a brain consuming OSM shop
        data (or actually, _any_ external data from _anywhere_) will
        look at the values contained in it***.

    And that is exactly what lead to proposing this edits - I was
    writing code to handle OSM
    data and researched tagging situation. And one of[1] effects was
    discovering numerous
    cases of tags that seem to be exact duplicates of more standard
    ones, and retagging
    them seems to clearly improve OSM data as far as I can see

    Your continued tagfiddling here is making it much harder for local
    mappers to find problem values in OSM data.

    No-one's going to complain about you changing "shop=shoe" to
    "shop=shoes" - they clearly have the same meaning, so changing the
    less common form to the more common form is a net benefit.

    However, your recent changes have gone much further than this,
    included changing shops with values you don't understand into
    "shop=yes".

For start: no such changes will be made, if requested I can revert changes
of shop=fixme to shop=yes if it is disputed.

-----------

But I do not really agree with some claims made here and want to explain why.

For start there is a long list of shop values which meaning I do not understand
(for example, from start of list of exactly such values:
shop=grossery, shop=towing, shop=showroom, shop=salon, shop=garage,
shop=pond, shop=consignment...)

This change was made because it was carrying no real info and was obscure value
unlikely to be found and handled by mappers.

    As an example, consider
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353944525 .  It was previously
    "shop=retail", an unusual and rare tag that would likely flag up
    the interest of a passing local mapper.  You changed it to
    "shop=yes", of which there are 180,000 of in OSM.

Except people using JOSM validator*, iD, StreetComplete and other tools with special support for shop=yes as feature tag. Note that this tools are more or less proactive
while shop with unusual values will be spotted solely by manual checks
(as listing all unusual shop values is far from helpful and requires a long filtering to skip undocumented values, aliases, confusing values carrying some info)

*and therefore also Osmose, though I would not recommend this QA tool

    No-one is going to spot that as an "unusual" shop at all.

Thousands/tens of thousands were fixed already, at least 10 000 would be
definitely not spotted and not fixed if they would be just one of 10237 rare shop values.


A render finding an unexpected value could simply handle it as 'shop=yes' and carry on.


If you want to flag these to mappers?Then contact the relevant mapper then failing a contact add a fixme/note. ???


shop=garage .. A shop that sells garages...

https://www.totalspan.com.au/residential/garages/garages-with-workshops/
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to