On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 12:00 PM Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote:
> On 03.09.22 at 12:52, Simon Poole wrote: > > Anyway IMHO this would seem to make more sense as a maproulette > > challenge or osmose warning than a bulk edit given the number is quite > > manageable and at least some of the objects can probably be mapped to > > one of the "proper" subtypes. > > Perfect is the enemy of good and insisting on doing it manually will > just result in the work not getting done. > > I support doing this as an automated edit. Anyone who wants to set up a > Maproulette task to inspect all ways that were previously tagged > service=driveway2 is welcome to do so. This way, if the task doesn't get > done, at least it won't have prevented the removal of a nonsensical and > confusing value from the database. > And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology For the original thread, see: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-September/087734.html
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
