Cool. Are you proposing this as a wg item?
--aaron
On 27 Jun 2017, at 16:22, Tommy Pauly wrote:
Hi Aaron,
We have a draft we’ll be publishing in the next week that does a
survey of Transport Security protocols, and the interfaces they expose
to the transport layer as well as applications. We’d like to have a
slot to discuss this topic with the WG.
Thanks,
Tommy
On Jun 27, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Here the short list of topics recently raised for our next meeting
and some questions/comments. Please respond and suggest any other
topics.
draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt
There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there
any specific topics we should set aside time to discuss?
Socket Intents
Again, what specific topics should we discuss?
We’ve been told to expect 3 drafts: on general concepts, BSD
implementation, & communication granularity. What’s worth
discussing?
Michio Honda HotNets paper “PASTE: Network Stacks Must Integrate
with NVMM Abstractions
<http://www.ht.sfc.keio.ac.jp/%7Emicchie/papers/paste-hotnets16.pdf>”
“These days I'm working on networking interface for non-volatile
main memory (a.k.a. persistent memory and storage-class memory),
because with such devices networking stack/API becomes a bottleneck
in the end-to-end communication that involves persistent media (disk
or SSDs for now). I saw some post-socket discussion in the minutes of
the last meeting, so I wonder if this type of work could give some
useful information to IETFers who design new transport API
standards.”
Is there interest in this topic? AFAIK, there’s no Internet Draft.
I will inquire whether Michio intends to submit one.
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
