Hi All, On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> I think it's time to level up and have a discussion about "policy" and how > it relates to TAPS. > > I'm going to leave the definition of "policy" here deliberately vague with > the hope that we can start to build some terminology around it at the > meeting. > > > +1 to having a general discussion on the topic of policy (both > application-specified and system-specified), likely following onto the > presentation of intents. Getting a formal set of definitions would really > help moving forward in our discussions. > > > +1 from me too. > > BTW, NEAT already has quite an elaborate policy system built in. Naeem > gave a high-level look at it at the last meeting: > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides- > 98-taps-42-neat-naeem-khademi-00.pdf (slides 6/7) > > More details are here: > https://www.neat-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ > commag16-accepted-version.pdf > This says “until published”, but I think this has just happened: > http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7945852/ > > I'd be happy join the discussion on policy aspects (unfortunately, only remotely). As Michael mentioned, the implemented NEAT policy system is fairly flexible. The most up-to-date documentation can be found on the NEAT GitHub <https://github.com/NEAT-project/neat/blob/master/policy/README.md> pages. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Zdravko
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
