Hi, In line:
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Updated: > > draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt > > There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there any specific > topics we should set aside time to discuss? I appreciated this discussion much, but personally I don’t think know of any specific topic that we need to discuss here - plus, there seem to be plenty of other good things to talk about which will all need time. Cheers, Michael > > Transport Security Protocol Survey, Tommy > > The common features/interface presented by various security protocols > The ability to separate security handshakes from data encryption > Socket Intents, Concepts & Communication Granularity, Phillipp > > Application- & System-Specified Policy & TAPS, Brian? Tommy? > > Michio Honda HotNets paper “PASTE: Network Stacks Must Integrate with NVMM > Abstractions > <http://www.ht.sfc.keio.ac.jp/%7Emicchie/papers/paste-hotnets16.pdf>” > “These days I'm working on networking interface for non-volatile main memory > (a.k.a. persistent memory and storage-class memory), because with such > devices networking stack/API becomes a bottleneck in the end-to-end > communication that involves persistent media (disk or SSDs for now). I saw > some post-socket discussion in the minutes of the last meeting, so I wonder > if this type of work could give some useful information to IETFers who design > new transport API standards.” > Is there interest in this topic? AFAIK, there’s no Internet Draft. I will > inquire whether Michio intends to submit one. May end up in TSVAREA > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
