Sveiki, Friday, April 8, 2011, 8:08:14 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Jernej, >> It isn't - but it's not any worse than using an unencrypted >> connection. > OK, but what to do if the other side does not wish to install some encryption? > I had to delete mine, because no one of the people I'm exchanging mail with, > has de/encryption. The answers I get the most if asking for it, are: > - "That's much too complicated, I don't want to spend time to read how that > works." > - "Can't do that myself and don't want to pay the guy again for that." > - "Bullshit, they don't check my mail, you're becoming a schizo." > So if delicate info has to become exchanged, we spread it over mail, instant > messaging in Skype and Windows Messenger and webphone. > That is fine for me too, because I myself still find the kind of encryption > available rather awkward. We were talking about Client to IMAP/POP3/SMTP server encryption here. All it does is protects your password, and partially protects traffic comming from you to your server. Other people don't need to install anything, they can read your email just fine. -- Best regards, Vilius ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
