Hello Vilius, On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:07:15 +0300 GMT (06/Apr/11, 22:07 PM +0700 GMT), Vilius Šumskas wrote:
>> VŠ> What's the point to accept and store self-signed certificate >> VŠ> anyway? It ads zero security. >> >> You are right, it does not add security. However, it adds >> convenience. VŠ> Convenience? How? Byu not having to click OK to accept the cert each time I send a message. I thought that was clear, >> VŠ> This was discussed on this list extensively multiple times, and if >> VŠ> you really really really know what you are doing, just add root CA >> VŠ> to trusted CAs. >> >> I tried that, but the result was that I could not send at all any >> more. As this is not a beta issue, we can continue the discussion on >> TBUDL. VŠ> Maybe you have added certificate itself, not root CA? Hm, possible. I am not an expert on certs. VŠ> I'm not sure about version 5, but it worked for me when I tested VŠ> it during 4.x beta cycle. If it doesn't work in version 5.0 it VŠ> needs to be reported on BT and fixed of course. True, but there is still a chance it works correctly in both versions but I (the dumb user) just doesn't know what to click. >> As I said in the other mail a moment ago, not really important on my >> side, but it would be nice not to have to click OK each time I send a >> mail. VŠ> You can do this by using standard plain text connection method. Of course. Some people told me I should use TLS for security. TB! supports it. You are saying I should ignore security? -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
