Hello Vilius, On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:54:50 +0300 GMT (06/Apr/11, 22:54 PM +0700 GMT), Vilius Šumskas wrote:
>> >> VŠ> What's the point to accept and store self-signed certificate >> >> VŠ> anyway? It ads zero security. >> >> >> >> You are right, it does not add security. However, it adds >> >> convenience. >> >> VŠ> Convenience? How? >> >> Byu not having to click OK to accept the cert each time I send a >> message. I thought that was clear, VŠ> I ment that self signed certificate adds zero security. Tell that to my university! VŠ> I were not talking about the possibility to add such certificates VŠ> into exception list. The conclusion is that if you care about VŠ> security you should be using properly signed certificates. And if VŠ> you are using self-signed certs you doesn't really care about VŠ> security and should be prepared for inconveniences that are VŠ> DESIGNED to annoy ordinary users which doesn't care about security VŠ> either. Whatever. I just want to send my messages without having to click OK each time. Remember, I'm the user and not the one who decided on the policy. Can we continue this discussion on TBUDL please, as it is not a beta issue and not really relevant to the new release? -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.6.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
