Gleason, On 30-12-2007 15:56, you wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Well, naturally, I cannot comment on this.
> You could try the others to see how well they do. >>> Filters work. >> Not always. > Nothing is always. TB is quite reliable. >>> So, the point is that Imap still might not work well for you, but it >>> is not the case that Rit is conning anybody. I for one have seen TB >>> Imap go from absolutely unusable to very good over the past few years. >> I am opposing that we were promised IMAP for version 2. And version3. >> Basic functionality is still not working. Now we hear that 4.1 will >> bring the fixes. >> I think this is conning users. > I have not seen a promise that 4.1 will do Imap the way you like it. > It seems a common pattern in the world of software, especially email > software, to bring out a feature and spend some years perfecting it. > What I see is that TB's Imap, at long last, does work pretty well, but > Eudora, Pegausus, Pocomail still do not. Courier is still far behind > the flock, promising to catch up some day, and Thunderbird is more > complete than Courier, but still some years behind in features. There > are others, but none are better than these. -- <greeting> Best regards </greeting> <author> Peter Fjelsten </author> <thebat version> 3.99.3 Pro </thebat version><extras> MyGate, AVG </extras> <env.> 2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 200K+ msgs. </env.> <os> Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 </os> ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
