Hi Gleason Pace, On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:12:30 -0500 Gleason Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alto, > > GP>> The thing that amazes me is that people can continue to argue that TB > GP>> Imap does not work while so many of us here attest otherwise. > > > A matter of usage behaviour, I suppose. If I start TheBat at nine in > > the morning and at ten have to discover that it's not like nobody > > would have sent me any mail in the meantime but that TheBat's joblist > > has frozen and is simply not collecting the new mail already piling up > > in my account, for me that's the definition of "not usable". If I have > > to discover days after answering some mails that my answers in fact > > hadn't been sent as directed but are still lingering in the out > > folder, that also constitutes "not usable". > > > Other people may have other definitions. > > No, other people have at least that definition. Even Thunderbird can > do that much. TB users (like me) usually have a number of other > message handling requirements. What we are having trouble expressing > effectively is that TB meets all those requirements. > > Usually a person who is getting a behavior from their software that > other users don't...usually that person would wonder about conditions > on their computer and not condemn the software as unusable. > I have wondered if it was a condition here but as both Thunderbird and Becky email display imap correctly then the problem with TheBat must solely lay with thebat, cannot be a condition on my computer Sean
pgpJl6cnAqUrc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
