Peter, >> Because I heard you accusing TB of ripping people off. If somebody >> gets the prize for making a big splash, doing little to fix >> anything, and fading away with people's money, it has to be Slaven >> Radich.
> Irrelevant. If your claim is irrelevant, perhaps you will tire of making it. >>> I never have problems with >>> Outlook. >> But Outlook is not the program that TB is either, is it? Have you >> made a list of the things that TB does in the way of mail handling >> that Outlook does not? >> Virtual folders > Outlook 2007 has it. >> Color groups > And this. >> View mode > And this. >> etc. > Again, we were talking about IMAP, and how "hard" it is. You were, after you changed the topic which was whether Rit was ripping people off. But yes, Imap is a difficult protocol, and it looks to me like Rit gets the prize for sticking to the task of producing an email client that does a respectable job of navigating it. >> And if you have bought all the MS Office versions since 97, how much >> have you paid? > Nothing. I use it at work. But it is a little pricey for home work, isn't it? I bought Office 2000 for $600 (US) once upon a time. I haven't felt motivated to do that again. -- Gleason Using 4.0.0.6 (ALPHA) on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600. IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html