Hello, Marck,

On Monday, February 14, 2000, you wrote:

MDP> You  said  elsewhere in this thread that the ticker virtual folder was
MDP> no  good  because  messages  were  scattered.  And here you state that
MDP> you've  at  least  seen  the  threaded  message  list. Ever thought of
MDP> combining the two? Threading the ticker virtual folder? It's how I use
MDP> it - works pretty good for me.

   Admittedly it's an improvement. Instead of scattered articles, you
   have scattered threads from different folders. Progress.

   Now, what about the messages not on the ticker? If you work at your
   computer, as I do, you probably have some folders marked not to
   show up on the ticker. Getting to the unread articles in them is
   still a chore with the current available key strokes.

   You also wrote:

> Perhaps  a  truer  implementation  is  (yet) another keystroke  to
> "Open  a  folder  at  the first new message". This is what  should
> really  be asked for here, rather than any change to the  existing
> and, IMHO, *very* logical behaviour.

  Yes, this would help. To me, though, the most *logical* behavior
  would be (1) if there are no unread messages in a folder, open it at
  the last read message, but (2) if there are unread messages in a
  folder, open it from the first unread message. As others have
  expressed, I don't ordinarily go back and look at read messages, and
  when I do, it's not necessarily the last one I have read. So your
  logic here escapes me.

  In any case, I'm really asking for flexibility here, rather than
  insisting there can only be one logical way to approach folder
  navigation.

-- 
Yours,
  John De Hoog, Tokyo
   http://dehoog.org



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------


You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Reply via email to