Tuesday, May 02, 2000, 5:58:49 PM, Allie wrote:
> The reason why I wish to clarify this is because with TB!, when composing
> and the lines get wrapped, these CR's, although inserted by the editor,
> really equate to hard CR's. The wrapping isn't redone upon sending as far
> as I can tell. This is the basis behind it's strict WYSIWYG editing
> engine. The concept of a soft CR is therefore not present in this editor
> as far as my knowledge of what it is goes.
My point is they don't have to be and the internal logic of the editor can
be changed to reflect any sort of reality so long as the final product, what
is output, falls within the limitations of the medium. Quite frankly I
wouldn't care if TB! references everything internally with HTML tags to denote
<P>paragraphs</P> versus implicit <BR>breaks as long as when it goes out it
conforms to what was presented to me.
What we're talking about is concepts and semantics, nothing more. There
is no reason that TB! cannot have the /concept/ of hard/soft CRs internally.
None.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
