JDH> I wonder what the Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval (GNKSA) JDH> recommendations say about this. I can't find it but I'm pretty sure that it requires a warning for a blank subject and recommends not allowing it at all, but this is for Usenet afterall... -tom! -- Hopin' this said *something* useful, [EMAIL PROTECTED] out. -- -------------------------------------------------------------- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
- Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])" Dierk Haasis
- Re: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])" Januk Aggarwal
- Re: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])" Trevor Roberts
- Re: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])" Tom Plunket
- Re[2]: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2])... phil
- Re: Numbering of Replys "(RE:[2]... Tom Plunket
- Re[2]: Numbering of Replys "... phil
- Re: No Subject warning John De Hoog
- Re: No Subject warning Jast
- Re: No Subject warning John De Hoog
- DEAD HORSE (was Re: No S... Tom Plunket
- DEAD HORSE (was Re: No S... Marck D. Pearlstone
- Re[2]: No Subject warnin... phil
- Re[2]: No Subject warnin... phil
- Re: No Subject warning Marck D. Pearlstone
- Re[2]: No Subject warnin... phil
- List Moderators Nick Andriash
- Re[2]: No Subject warnin... phil
- Re: No Subject warning Tom Plunket
- Re: No Subject warning John De Hoog
- SOT: Options and user contro... Tom Plunket