Hallo Oleg,
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000 10:49:35 +0400 GMT (25/12/2000, 14:49 +0800 GMT),
OK3 wrote:
O> Not really. RFC states that both CC and BCC recipients might be listed
O> or not. That only depends on server administration preference wich are
O> in turn based on tradition and common sence. But that doesn't mean
O> that server which leaves BCC addresses in headers are breaking RFC.
It wouldn't make sense to me to treat BCC address like CC addresses.
anyway, which RFC are you and syafril referring to? Let's look it up.
;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.48f
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
