-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi ETM,
@27 March 2002, 21:47:13 -0500 (02:47 UK time) ETM wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have noticed the problem. My reply to all placed you in To > position, TBUDL in CC position (which this mailing list will *not* > accept), and so I will alter the addresses to send. You actually only need to use "Reply" on this list, not Reply all. In fact, can I discourage folks from using Reply all on this list? It creates extra work for the moderators and double messages for the recipient. > ... The To addressee was the private party AT THE DANG MAILING LIST > address and TB had dropped his private address totally. I have seen > it happen again and don't like the address being changed to include > the poster's name appended to the list address. It's just plain > strange. Surely, it is not intentional and has to be a bug. It is intentional, not a bug and easily configurable. On the main account properties, Templates, Reply, see the option: "Do not use FROM name for REPLY addresses" and *turn it off* ;-). - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator · TB! v1.60-14F4B4B2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) iD8DBQE8ogl/OeQkq5KdzaARAsblAKC0MxQMUcoqhpifzH4VsTAZE3KssACcDpvW 5hiFHlMYOo2S/xc7cPNOIsI= =Ty6t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60 / 1.60a FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
