Hi Online,
On Sunday, September 22, 2002 at 10:53 GMT -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[osn] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
osn> Totally in agreement. In the past I used SPUMBUSTER and then
osn> SPAMKiller, but I that was taking a lot of time.
Yes, it does get time consuming. I haven't had to adjust my Bat
filters in quite awhile and they work like a charm.
osn> I used the filteres not only for spam but for virus as well. For
osn> every critical virus I input key words of the subjetct matter.
osn> And that has worked pretty well, better and 1000% than
osn> Spamkiller.
I haven't tried that yet, but I've had pretty good luck with Norton
2002. It seems to catch everything.
osn> Having had problems with the delete command I have lost couple of
osn> account and in the process of moving filters I realized that the
osn> best strategy is to have the filters as outside files.
I'm not sure what you mean by outside files unless you're referring to
selective download. I tried that, but decided that I'd rather see
everything just to be safe.
osn> Today I used to filters only: the SUBJET Filter and the HEADERS
osn> Filter. And it is working like hell.
I do some text filters as well as some of the spam has the same text
in the message body but different subject lines. It does work well and
separates The Bat from any of the other email programs I've tried.
--
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA
_________________________________________________________________
AIM:kbc49 ICQ:2727351 Yahoo/MSM:kbc1949
________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
