On Saturday, October 4, 2003, 1:35:35 PM, Vishal wrote: V> Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv footer V> then, instead of relying on users?
Marck has already explained why this does not work, earlier in this thread. Only text which falls below the last cut-mark inserted will be stripped, which means that if you have a cutmark, followed by a signature, followed by a listserv footer which also contains a cut-mark, the signature inserted by the sender will not be stripped. I really have trouble understanding why this is such an issue. It's so simple to insert a cutmark, it can even be automated using templates. I really don't understand why people are objecting to being asked to use a cutmark. Reasonable netiquette is, imo, the equivalent of saying please & thank-you irl. It costs nothing & makes life easier & more pleasant for everyone. -- Deborah "We hold these Truths to be self-evident..." which is a gracious, Jeffersonian, way of saying, "Any idiot ought to be able to understand this." - Former Congressman Bob McEwen ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
