On 26/3/2006 at 4:57:10 AM [GMT -0500], Stephane Bouvard [Ml] wrote: > I still do not see the compatibility problem : is there some systems > unable to read correctly messages without hardwrapping ? That > question remain open for me : is there a compatibility problem with > mails using no hardwrapping ? Is someone unable to read this mail > because their reader cannot wrap itself ?
Consider a widescreen format display ... 17". The user decides on a full height account tree layout for TB!. The user also wishes to make use of his screen and show the message list nicely with a few informative columns not all crunched up and chopped off. After-all, he has the screen real estate for it. The preview window is below the message list pane, nice and wide as the message list. At the users font size, text in the preview pane, window wraps at 160 characters. Not very comfortable to read, now is it? So though the wrapping occurs, it's still a problem. So I leave you and that user to argue/discuss about the virtues of hard-wrapping e-mail text. :) This may not be resolved on an individual basis and I like your wish to be able to choose editor via a template macro. However, it's not there ... not yet. :) -- -= Curtis =- The Bat! v3.72.04 (Beta) / http://specs.aimlink.name PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name ...Suicide is the most sincere form of self criticism.
pgpr5xbzDQf8A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
