Am Samstag, 12. Juni 2010 05:11:46 schrieb Don Simons: > I'm not sure what you'd like me to do or comment on. Did you manually edit > the M-Tx output?
Yes I did so because it was the fasted way at the moment. Of course later on I will use C for a specified program or try sed, as David pointed out. The main purpose for sending the pmx output was if one could understand beside the elimination of the "rp /" the change of the instrument number in row 36 and 225 and deleting rows 227 and 228. Would it be possible to change the thick-thin-bar at the end of a movement into a normal bar? I suppose there should be a special TeX-inline code . > If so, and if you describe how you'd like the vertical > spacing, I could work out what commands to insert in the PMX to achieve it. > I don't know if it's worth trying to do that with PMX commands embedded in > M-Tx, if you're going to manually edit the M-Tx output anyway. > > I'm guessing you manually inserted the redefinition of \interstaff . I > can't see why. I think the original unequal spacing on page 1 is due to the > figures sticking down below the 3rd system. If I comment out the > redefinition of \interstaff and insert "Ae", Now using "Ai" for different parts I got a much better spacing. Hermann > at least the systems come out > equally spaced. I'm sure the vertical spacing could be further improved > with some trial and error, forcing some page breaks, and maybe using some > other tricks, either PMX or in-line TeX. Tell me some more about what you > want to do. > > --Don > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to > http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-mus >ic
_______________________________________________ tex-mu...@icking-music-archive.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://mailman.nfit.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/icking-music-archive.org-tex-music
