2012/12/31 Simon Dreher <simon.dre...@gmx.net>: > The problem is the LTS version: either you use the up-to-date version > (raring? At least quantal!) and get texlive2012, or you use the LTS > version getting only security fixes and some tested bugfix version and > have a stable, but soon somehow outdated system... it was your choice > ;-) Of course you /can/ install texlive by hand, if you don't care about > the benefits of a clean system package management system. Actually it is > often recommended, but somehow this is a bit contradictive to the idea > of LTS distros...
Even LTS distros have backports, don't they? The question is always: what is more important, the distro or the package? TeXLive is so big and I use it so much that installing a new version manually once a year off the DVD is worth it. Anything Haskell-based is nicer to install via cabal. For everything else I stick to a distro (and yes, I have strong preference for LTS in that case). ------------------------------- TeX-music@tug.org mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
