> > Indeed, this problem for the first time made me read some js articles. > > However, it's daunting, as this would take me months for coming up > > with something usable myself. > > I hope the sample code I provided helped getting you a sense of how to > get started. >
It didn't change the sense I've got before, that I would have to spend a few months exclusively learning javascript till I would be able write anything humble myself. This would defeat the beauty of TiddlyWiki to me, of learning a little specific html and css as one goes along to adapt TW to ones need. I don't want to write plugins for TW - but adapt, __use__ and share - if I consider anything worthy. Developing javascript plugins is a completely different approach, which I don't have the ambition, nor would want to earn my daily bread for. Everyone has to make priorities. > >> This might be simplified by reading the transclusion source from a > >> dedicated tiddler (or even just a variable) and applying that value > >> using evaluated parameters on the tiddler macro call. The respective > >> control would then refresh the containing the macro call. > > > Had to read this sentence trice to understand half of what you meant - > > did I got it right? > > > > http://double.tiddlyspot.com/#SiteSubtitle > > I'm not sure but it doesn't seem like what I had in mind (also see > below). > Well - as a user - neither did I know what to do now, with what I read below. Other than to study javascript to be able to write plugins myself. But where would it come to, if every user would be converted to a developer? I think each role has its place, and where developers might really be at an advantage to share, there are other areas with real importance. Priorities again. > Well, this doesn't actually have anything to do with Tiddlywiki > transclusion; those are backreferences* from the RegEx search & replace. > > > Now, only Opera chokes and gives the following error message ... > > Looks like that might be a copy & paste error - or perhaps some weird > interaction due to the misunderstanding above? > >From a (Firefox) TW users standpoint - it now works even better this way than MenuMore, and I'm sufficiency satisfied :-) > Your sample made me remember, wasn't there a navigation menu doing > something very similar, using tabs? It might have been Morris's work. > Well, the original - and in my eyes most beautiful - would be this: http://yann.perrin.googlepages.com/twkd.html but would introduce its own specific limitations. Regards.. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
