Hey all, Question: Is this going to impact the way NodeJS servers saves tiddlers to file? Will they no longer be .tid files, and maybe be .json files instead?
-Flibbles On Friday, July 23, 2021 at 9:53:46 PM UTC-4 TW Tones wrote: > Springer, > > From a design perspective for column headings I would stick to a standard > fields such as column-heading with the value"🎾" on a tiddler called > "tennis", or as the case may be a sport tiddler. > > Already dynamic tables support alternate column names in a standard > field/value and there is not reason in my view to tamper with fieldnames. > > I am sure there are reasons, but your suggestion to me, is like I posted > previously, you may be about to hang yourself with the extra rope you have > being given for field names. I would avoid this excursion unless you can > establish a good reason otherwise you are possibly forgoing the ability to > use your tiddlers, with the large library of plugins and macros that have > gone before. > > Just my viewpoint > Tones > > > On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 23:58:23 UTC+10 springer wrote: > >> Mario, >> >> Thanks for the bracket fix! (I should have caught that, but was getting >> bleary-eyed.) >> >> When you say, "you mainly test with tiddler titles, and not fields. Even >> if you have strange field names...," I'm not sure what you mean. I have >> focused mostly on having strange field names that correspond to strange >> tiddler titles, partly because I anticipate that the newly open field-name >> space will get half its value from letting field names correspond to >> tiddler titles. And because of the centrality of Shiraz to my own workflow, >> I have been testing how Shiraz (especially dynamic tables) behaves with the >> new field name possibilities. >> >> My other anticipated use for strange field names is to serve as compact >> headings in dynamic tables, where the difference between "tennis" and 🎾 or >> "recyclable" and ♻︎ (in a field with √ or X values) is conservation of >> horizontal table space. >> >> So: What other kinds of tests do you (and others) see as important? >> Though my coding skills are minimal, the challenge to test the limits of a >> new feature is one area where I enjoy chipping in as best I can. >> >> -Springer >> >> On Friday, July 23, 2021 at 8:37:23 AM UTC-4 PMario wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Nice tests, but you mainly test with tiddler titles, and not fields. >>> Even if you have strange field names in your tiddlers. >>> >>> >>> https://springerspandrel.github.io/tw/new-json-tw-experiment.html#Show%20related%20field-table%20(ViewTemplate) >>> >>> .. The filter is probably broken, because the number of opne/close braces >>> are wrong. The last closing brace is missing ...first[]] >>> >>> BUT I didn't test the code. >>> >>> -mario >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/189614e5-f812-4aeb-b238-f7fa264df5fen%40googlegroups.com.
