On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Dani Zobin wrote: > Hey Alex, that's interesting. How that's? One of the prominent elements that > I noticed during my short time in this list, is that people here seem to be > JS/css developers, or half the way there, as this is what needed to twist > the application (and it seems that everybody do it). Which is fine for me > personally, but I did notice to myself that this is probably not an app for > regular end users
Unfortuknately, that seems to be true, but not necessary. What is needed is decent documentation, sufficient at least for getting potential adopters who are not developers, who are attracted by the potential practical applications of TiddlyWiki in their own work, over the hump of initial bafflement. Most of the available documentation, on the websites and in the PlugInInfo tiddlers that accompany many plugins, is as obscure as TiddlyWiki itself is to the potential non-developer adopter. E.g., some don't bother to mention dependencies on other readily available plugins. Sophisticated users, especially developers, are generally not good at writing documentation. What is needed is a writer who can put himself or herself in the position of a naive adopter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
