Dear All, Please, please stop discussing. Can't you see this whole issue seriously hurts TiddlyWiki, and hurts the community? Every day this lasts longer the damage becomes bigger. So, be a man and acknowledge that this version was released too early and withdraw it. AND replace the download-site immediately with v2.6.2 again.
Yes, these are hard words, but i.m.h.o. honestly written in the interest of TiddyWiki. I still believe in TW. Best regards, Ton van Rooijen On 18 aug, 09:17, rakugo <jdlrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to be clear, just because the upgrade feature is not working - it > does not mean the product "doesn't work on popular browsers". As > Tobias points out it is possible to download an empty TiddlyWiki 2.6.3 > and import content into there. TiddlyWiki still allows you to save > content to itself which is its core offering! That doesn't appear > broken to me... Saying it is dead is akin to saying Microsoft Windows > is dead because the Windows update feature is not working! > > Yes there are problems with the import functions in Firefox 5, but I > believe these can be fixed and they __will___ be fixed! > > Remember, only upgrade if there is a reason to - ie. your existing > version is broken or there is a new feature you need! > > AlanBCohen, it sounds like one of the plugins you have is incompatible > with the latest version of TiddlyWiki and may require updating. > wikifyPlain has been deprecated, but should still be available to > plugins so shouldn't have broken your TiddlyWiki indicating > something's gone wrong here... I'll look into it and try and get this > fixed! Thanks for the feedback. > > Cheers, Jon > > On Aug 17, 8:43 pm, Tobias Beer <beertob...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Upgrading... > > > I never really understood the need of a dedicated, internal updgrade > > process. Why not just import all tiddlers from an existing tiddlywiki > > into a plain TiddlyWiki of the new version? If there are plugin > > errors, you will sure see them. > > > Also, I don't think it is reasonable to suggest it were a good idea to > > upgrade TiddlyWiki's just for the sake of a "because i can", a > > statement which surely doesn't apply when it comes to jQuery. In that > > regard I wished the single-file paradigm would be dropped already... > > or be more of an alternative than a core tenet. > > > Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
